Group assignment
The
aim of this assignment is to give hand on experience to 7111AFE
students on financial analysis using real-life data. It provides
students the opportunity to show through their ability to apply their
accounting knowledge and analytical skills to a real-world setting.
The value of this assignment is 10% of total assessment.
Groups
1. Students are needed to work in groups. Each group must have at least of 4 and a maximum of 5 students.
2. Students organize themselves into 4 or 5 groups and make sure that contact details of each member have been exchanged.
3. Each group will be needed to prepare only one report and the team leader must submit on behalf of the group
Assignment structure
Using
the 2014 and 2015 annual report of Harvey Norman Holdings Ltd and Myer
Holding Ltd, address both Part A and B. all issues related to the
financial figures.
Note: we mention the name of these companies for reference purpose only. You will find actual company name in your assignments.
Part A
Motivation (5 marks)
Is
it appropriate to compare between Harvey Norman Holdings Ltd and Myer
Holdings Ltd? Why or why not? To what extent are these two entities
similar or different in terms of their structure and line of business?
You may use additional resources for answering this part. If you use
additional resources, they must be referenced (Harvard) in your report
Part B
Analyse Report (45 marks)
Assuming
you are a financial adviser and a client has approached you seeking
your advice whether the client should invest in Harvey Norman (ASX code:
HVN) or Myer (ASX code: MYR) by conducting a of both entities. You should evaluate the entities in terms of “2.1
Liquidity, 2.2 Efficiency and Profitability, 2.3 Stability and 2.4
Investment”. Appropriate ratios (please round them to four decimal
places) should be calculated to enable a complete assessment of the
companies. The report should contain a discussion and analysis of the
ratios calculated. The workings and calculations for all the ratios must
be included in the report and should be presented in an appendix
Marking criteria
1. Part A: 5 marks
a. Your answer will be assessed for logic, arguments, and evidence
b. Marks will be awarded anywhere from zero to 5.
2. Part B: 45 marks(28 marks for ratios and 17 marks for the body of the report)
a. Marks will be deducted for incorrect ratios.
b.
For the body of the report, your work will be assessed for correct
interpretation of the ratios, logic and analysis, insight and correct
recommendation.
Challenges may face by students
Students
may face several challenges while completing this assessment such as
problems of making references, lack of writing skills, making report
etc. Students can take help and guidance from our technical experts and
get better grades in their assessments.
No comments:
Post a Comment