Assignment brief
Guidelines for assignment submission
- There is one Assignment and individual progresses as shown in the Key Milestones.
- Each assignment/Presentation has its own submission date. All the tasks have to be submitted by the dates specified in Key Milestones. The first 5 reports should be submitted to the module leader and only the final report need to be submitted to the moodle.
- All the LOs MUST be submitted on time to be considered for a MERIT grade.
- The final assignments will be subject to PLAGIARISM PLAGIARISM is a serious academic offence and will automatically lead to ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURES.
- The attendance percentage and participation in class will contribute towards the achievement of Distinction grade.
- Each student in the GROUP needs to submit his / her own contributions to the project by the deadlines specified. All students should take part in the presentation.
Glossary
Analyse: Break an issue into its constituent parts. Look in depth at each part using supporting arguments and evidence for and against as well as how these interrelate to one another.
Compare: Identify the similarities and differences between two or more phenomena. Say if any of the shared similarities or differences are more important than others. ‘Compare’ and ‘contrast’ will often feature together in an essay question.
Evaluate: Give your verdict as to what extent a statement or findings within a piece of research are true, or to what extent you agree with them. Provide evidence taken from a wide range of sources which both agree with and contradict an argument. Come to a final conclusion, basing your decision on what you judge to be the most important factors and justify how you have made your choice.
Discuss: Essentially this is a written debate where you are using your skill at reasoning, backed up by carefully selected evidence to make a case for and against an argument, or point out the advantages and disadvantages of a given context. Remember to arrive at a conclusion.
Grade Descriptor | Indicative characteristic/s | Contextualisation | ||||||
M1 | An effective approach to | Throughout the assignment, student | ||||||
Identify and apply strategies | ||||||||
study and research has been | resolved complex problems to a good | |||||||
to find appropriate solutions | ||||||||
applied | standard of accuracy and detail. | |||||||
Maintain the clarity of your answers by | ||||||||
stating appropriate steps. You should be | ||||||||
explaining step by step how you arrived at | ||||||||
your solutions. | ||||||||
M2 | Throughout your assignment: | |||||||
Select / design and apply | The selection of methods and | · Clearly define the theories | ||||||
techniques/sources has been | involved and clear presentation of | |||||||
appropriate methods / | ||||||||
justified | the methods which you used. | |||||||
techniques | ||||||||
· Relevant theories and techniques | ||||||||
have been applied to solve the | ||||||||
problems. | ||||||||
· | Methods/theories/techniques | |||||||
applied have been clearly | ||||||||
presented. | ||||||||
M3 | The communication is | - | Logical and coherent steps have | |||||
Present and communicate | been presented to arrive at your | |||||||
appropriate for an unfamiliar | solutions. | |||||||
appropriate findings | ||||||||
audience and appropriate | - | Overall presentation is neat, spell | ||||||
media have been used | checked and appropriate for the | |||||||
intended audience. | ||||||||
- | Your notes should be organized, | |||||||
presentable and well planned. | ||||||||
- | You must use technical language | |||||||
where it is appropriate. | ||||||||
- | Your diagrams are to be drawn | |||||||
scale and should generally be void | ||||||||
of major discrepancies. | ||||||||
- | On time submission. | |||||||
- | A bibliography of sources used | |||||||
throughout the assignment | ||||||||
should be provided. | ||||||||
D1 | - | Conclusions have | - | Conclusions/recommendations | ||||
Use critical reflection to | been arrived at | arise directly out of the evidence | ||||||
through synthesis | produced. | |||||||
evaluate own work and | ||||||||
of ideas and have | - Good level of accuracy: By | |||||||
justify valid conclusions | ||||||||
been justified. | reviewing your work carefully, you | |||||||
- | Use Critical | will be able to detect mistakes or |
HNCB 034 Structural Analysis in Construction and the Built Environment - 2016 | M. Tohidi | ||||
reflection to | inconsistencies thus your level of | ||||
evaluate own | accuracy in your solutions can | ||||
work and justify | reflect the quality of your critical | ||||
valued | reflection. | ||||
conclusions | - | You have provided valid | |||
explanations showing how you | |||||
arrived to your conclusions. | |||||
D2 | Your effort throughout the | - | Independence has been | ||
Take responsibility for | demonstrated. Deadline has | ||||
module has been well | been met. | ||||
managing and organising | |||||
managed and organised. | - | Attendance percentage is at | |||
activities | |||||
least 80%. | |||||
- | Your assignment has been | ||||
appropriately planned and | |||||
managed from the research | |||||
stage to the final output. | |||||
D3 | Well developed methodical | - | Clear evidence of innovative | ||
Demonstrate | and creative thought is | ||||
approach was used in arriving | demonstrated in proposed | ||||
convergent/lateral/creative | |||||
at solutions with good level | solutions. | ||||
thinking | |||||
of accuracy and relevance. | - | Evidence of accuracy and good | |||
attention to detail has been | |||||
provided. | |||||
- | Synthesis of techniques and | ||||
concepts was used to arrive at | |||||
valid conclusions. | |||||
- | Engineering and mathematical | ||||
terminology/symbols have been | |||||
accurately used. | |||||
- | Solutions have been developed | ||||
in a coherent manner and for | |||||
the intended audience. | |||||
Document Ref. | ` | ||||
Title | |||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | ||||
Made by | Date | Output | |||
Checked by | ` | Date | |||
LO1 Be able to analyse bending moments and shear forces for statically determinate structures
Learning Outcome 1.1 Calculate bending moments and shear forces for cantilevers and supported beams
Analyse bending moments and shear forces for statically determinate structures. The grade that you will be awarded depends on the quality of your detailed explanations, your level of accuracy, the number of correct answers you will provide etc.
- For the all beams shown below, determine:
a. The support reactions RA | and RB | ||||||
b. The shear force and bending moment diagrams | |||||||
Beam 1 | |||||||
300kN | 300kN | ||||||
A | B | ||||||
4m | 2m | 2m | |||||
78N 50N
Beam 2
A B
3m 8m
100N
15 KN/m (UDL)
Beam 3
A | B | ||||||||||||||||
M | |||||||||||||||||
25 m | 2 m | ||||||||||||||||
Document Ref. | ` | ||||
Title | |||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | ||||
Made by | Date | Output | |||
Checked by | ` | Date | |||
LO1.1 (CONT.)
For the cantilevers shown below, determine:
- The support reactions R
- The shear force and bending moment diagrams
6 KN
Cantilever 1
5 m 2 m
Cantilever 2 | 3 KN/m (UDL) | |||||||||||
6m | 1m | |||||||||||
M | 1m | |||||||||||
Document Ref. | ` | ||||
Title | |||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | ||||
Made by | Date | Output | |||
Checked by | ` | Date | |||
Learning Outcome -1.2 Calculate bending moments and shear forces in a three pin frame
- Draw bending moment and shear force diagram
50 KN
8m 3m
- A 3 pinned frame is shown in Figure 1.2. Present step by step calculations to show how you would calculate bending moments and shear forces in a statically determinate 3 pin frame and then draw the shear force diagram and the bending moment diagram accordingly. Your step by step detailed explanation, your accuracy, your attention to detail and the quality of your calculations will all contribute to a better grade
p=60 kN
P=25kN
D | 3 m |
3m 4m 4m
Fig. 1.2 3 Pinned frame
Document Ref. | ` | ||||
Title | |||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | ||||
Made by | DateOutput | ||||
Checked by | ` | Date | |||
B LO 2 Be able to analyse bending deflections for statically | |||||
determinate structures |
Learning Outcome 2.1 Calculate bending deflection for cantilevers and supported beams
Determine the equation of deflection and slope curve for a cantilever and simply supported beam AB subjected to point load of 200 kN. Also determine slope and deflection at B (cantilever only) and C (Both). Flexural rigidity of the beam is EI
50 kN/m
D: Deflection at B | C |
4m 2m
600 kN
C
3m 3m
Fig. 2.1 Determine deflection in cantilever and simply support beams
Document Ref. | ` | ||||
Title | |||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | ||||
Made by | DateOutput | ||||
Checked by | ` | Date | |||
LO 3 Be able to appraise the behaviour of elastic columns | |||||
subjected to axial loading |
Learning Outcome 3.1 Determine the axial load carrying capacity of perfectly elastic columns
- Define, describe and explain the following terms:
Axial load
Eccentric load
Effective length
Buckling considering various boundary
conditions
Determining the critical load carrying by the 3 different columns with different boundary conditions shown in Fig. 3.1, compare and discuss the results. The rigidity is EI.
P1 P2 P3
h1=4.56m h2=3 m
h=9 m
h2=3m
h1=4.5 m h2=3m
Fig. 3.1 Axial load carrying capacity
10
Document Ref. | ` | ||||
Title | |||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | ||||
Made by | Date | Output | |||
Checked by | ` | Date | |||
LO4 Be able to apply design methods
Explain the following concepts which are essential in producing valid designs for all the aforementioned structural members:
- Limit State Design
- Ultimate Limit State
- Serviceability Limit State
- Actions
- Permanent Actions
- Variable Actions
- Accidental Actions
- Partial safety factors
Try to also clarify your definitions by using diagrams or case studies as well as explaining in your own words the importance of each of these concepts to the design of the structural members.
Eurocode 2 and 3 sets out the Basis for structural design of structural members including steel beams, steel columns, reinforced concrete beams, reinforced concrete columns, and etc.
Beam Design
A simply supported beam is shown in Figure 4.1. This example demonstrates the design of a simply supported beam. The beam is 8.0 m long. In this example, it is assumed that the floor slab does offer lateral restraint. Using EC2 and EC3 regulations, design the beam assuming RC or steel section.
Compare the cost of structure using both designed cross section.
100 kN
45 kN/m
C
8m 8m
Fig. 4.1 Beam Design
HNCB 034 Structural Analysis in Construction and the Built Environment - 2016 | M. Tohidi | |||||
Document Ref. | ` | |||||
Title | ||||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | |||||
Made by | Date | Output | ||||
Checked by | ` | Date | ||||
Column Design
Determine maximum axial capacity of a simply supported column with height of 5m considering the following cross sections
8H22
450 mm
40 mm
40 mm
300 mm
Cross Section-RC
fc=30
MPa
Cross Section-Steel
fy=500
MPa
UKC 457*191*98
S275 MP
HNCB 034 Structural Analysis in Construction and the Built Environment - 2016 | M. Tohidi | |||||
Document Ref. | ` | |||||
Title | ||||||
Eurocode Ref. | ` | |||||
Made by | Date | Output | ||||
Checked by | ` | Date | ||||
4.3 Produce valid designs for timber beams and posts
1.Limit State Design
2.Ultimate Limit State
3.Serviceability Limit State
- Partial safety factors
- Beam design procedure
- Column design procedure
4.4 Produce valid designs for a masonry column
1.Limit State Design
2.Ultimate Limit State
- Partial safety factors
- Column design procedur
No comments:
Post a Comment