Assessment 2 Guidelines
Critical Appraisal
In this assessment task you are required
to delve deeper into understanding a problem, finding out what might
work best as a solution, and making recommendations based on this
evidence.
One important part of using research is
the ability to understand and appraise research. Appraising research
incorporates understanding how research is conducted and then critiquing
and evaluating the implications of a research publication.
In this assignment you are required to
critically appraise two (2) peer-reviewed research articles, one
involving quantitative and one involving qualitative research. Your
papers are as follows:
Read the articles and make sure you
understand the content, argument, vocabulary etc. Use the resources from
this unit to help you discuss relevant research principles and terms
relating to these two articles. Use the resources available through the
Library website to develop your understanding and to find additional
sources to support your analysis.
Identify the kind of study being
reported in these two articles, and locate a critical appraisal tool
that is appropriate to the study type (examples of tools will be
discussed in the unit). Cite the source of the original tool and provide
a brief explanation of whymyou selected the tool.
Order Now
Order Now
Use
the critical appraisal tool to examine the two articles, first noting
answers to the questions/items listed in the tool and then synthesising
your analysis. This forms the main section of your written appraisal.
Include page numbers from the research article in your answers to the
appraisal tool (i.e. cross reference where in the research article you
are finding the answers to the critical appraisal tool questions/items).
Use additional sources to help evaluate issues of validity,
representativeness etc.
Ensure that when you describe the
various strengths and weaknesses of the article that you explain your
analysis. For instance if the quantitative article had non-random
sampling you will state that, but then you also explain what the
implication is of this type of sampling. This will mean you will also
need to consult relevant articles an books on research methods. By doing
this you will be able to show the marker that you understand why the
aspect you have noted is a strength or a limitation of the study you are
analysing.
Use the National Statement on
Ethical Conduct in Research to describe the main ethical
issues pertaining to each of the two studies and briefly discuss how
they have been addressed.
Write a short summary of the
implications of each study’s findings for practice, recognising the
strength or quality of the findings from the articles.
Your critical appraisal should consist of the following sections:
- Introduction (~100 words)
A brief introductory paragraph where you
outline the purpose and main sections of your appraisal. This will
include which field you are making the recommendations for (e.g. public
health, health promotion, social work, health & human services
management).
- Tool selection (~200 words)
Explanation of tool selection. Attach a
copy of the tool in its original format to your assignment as an
appendix (does not contribute to the word count).
- Critical appraisal (~1500 words)
Analysis based on the critical appraisal tool selected and discussion of strengths and weaknesses of the articles.
- Ethical issues (~300 words)
Description of main ethical issues and discussion of how these have or have not been addressed.
- Summary of the implications of the appraised papers (~400 words) Short summary of implications of each study’s findings for practice.
- References
You will need to demonstrate high
standards of writing, presentation and referencing. Your report must
include a title page with your name, the title of the assignment and
word count (excluding reference list). You will need to number each
page, write with 1.5 line spacing and 2.5cm margins. You may use clearly
worded headings. The sample report writing template provided in the
Assessment folder may help. There is a 10% leeway on the 2500 word
count.
No comments:
Post a Comment