Task
Write a 2500 word report that addresses the ethical issues in the following case study.
Doing Ethics Technique – Hints and Tips
The 'Doing Ethics' technique is a
process for analysing ethical issues in any scenario. It doesn't
guarantee that what you come up with will be the best solution, but it
does help you to think ethically. The technique may seem a little vague
and perhaps lacking guidance, however the following might help you to
understand how to apply the technique in order to better understand
ethical analysis.
Q1. What's going on?
This is a synopsis of what the case is
all about. It can be taken from a variety of perspectives, for example,
from the perspective of a person raising a complaint, in which case, it
is a synopsis of the complaint. It can be taken from the perspective of
an involved observer, in which case, it is an outline of what was
observed, without going into too much detail. Where you see multiple
perspectives, you should describe them here.
Order Now
Q2. What are the facts?
This is a descriptive list of the facts
of the case. This doesn't just describe the case; it lists the facts as
they are known (from all sources and perspectives), and also what one
might reasonably consider to be possibilities. For example, if a person
was raising a complaint, Question 1 would outline their complaint, and
Question 2 would provide the evidence to both support and refute that
argument. All such facts must be demonstrable or supportable. It would
be worthwhile to assign a credibility weighting to each fact, to help
with later analysis.
Q3. What are the issues?
This is a list of ALL the issues that
are involved in the case. In Question 5 we can extract only the ethical
issues for further analysis, but for now, simply extract and describe
every relevant issue you can think of.
Q4. Who is affected?
This is a list of all the stakeholders
involved in the case. This need not be restricted to the ones
specifically mentioned in the case; you should consider who/what else
might be affected by the issues listed at Question 3, regardless of the
degree to which they are affected. In this question, you should describe
how each stakeholder is affected, both positively and negatively, and
perhaps comment on the degree of effect.
Q5. What are the ethical issues and implications?
For this question, you need to extract
only the ethical issues identified at Question 3. List the ethical
issues, discuss them in terms of classical ethical theory (as best you
can), and discuss their implications - on the stakeholders and on the
community in general.
Q6. What can be done about it?
This question elicits a general idea of
what can be done to resolve the case, whether those ideas are practical,
possible, or not. Generally what kind of resolutions might there be?
You need not go into great detail to answer this question, as its
purpose is to provide a basis for answering Question 7, but you do need
to think broadly and laterally to come up with several alternatives.
Q7. What are the options?
This question requires that you list and
describe (in detail) all the possible options that might be available
to resolve the case. Be creative here; the most obvious options are not
always the best. It's possible that not all options will result in a
positive outcome for all stakeholders. List and describe at least three
different options, and discuss the benefits and detriments of each.
Q8. Which option is best - and why?
In answering this question, you need to
assess which of the options described in Question 7 is the best. You are
recommending one of several options here, so you need to argue for your
recommendation, providing a solid basis in fact and reasonable (and
supportable) conjecture. You should add some of your own intellectual
property, as an ICT professional, into answering this question.
Supporting your argument based on classical ethical theory is not a
requirement at this point, but it is what would be expected if you were a
professional Ethicist.
Marking Guide
Assignment 2 Marking Sheet
Item | Max Marks | Given Marks |
Criterion 1: | ||
Appropriate Introduction | 2 | |
Criterion 2: | ||
Analysis using Doing Ethics Technique | 10 | |
Criterion 3: | ||
Analysis as an ICT professional with appropriate utilisation of the ACS Code of Ethics | 10 | |
Criterion 4: | ||
Appropriate Conclusion tying both analyses together | 5 | |
Criterion 5: | ||
Citations and references using Harvard standard | 3 | |
Criterion 6: | ||
Essay structure, grammar and spelling | 5 | |
Total | 35 |
Comments:
No comments:
Post a Comment